|
INSPECTION REPORT
HEMLINGTON HALL PRIMARY SCHOOL
Middlesbrough LEA area: Middlesbrough Unique reference number: 111664 Headteacher: Mrs P Baldwin
Lead inspector: Mr G Brown Dates of inspection: 29 September – 1 October 2003
Inspection number: 256386
Inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown copyright 2003
This
report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial
educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced
verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date
thereof are stated.
Further
copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School
Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report
and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A
charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any
other copies supplied.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL
| Type of school: |
Primary |
| School category: |
Community |
| Age range of pupils: |
3 to 11 years |
| Gender of pupils: |
Mixed |
| Number on roll: |
305 |
| School address: |
Briscoe Way |
|
Hemlington |
|
Middlesbrough |
|
Cleveland |
| Postcode: |
TS8 9SJ |
| Telephone number: |
01642 591171 |
| Fax number: |
01642 591019 |
| Appropriate authority: |
The governing body |
| Name of chair of governors: |
Mr A Trice |
| Date of previous inspection: |
26 April 1999 |
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCHOOL
The
305 pupils on roll include 51 children who attend the nursery part time
and 6 pupils who are registered in the local authority’s Infant
Assessment Unit accommodated in the school. Approximately 18 nursery
children are due to transfer to the reception class at the beginning of
the spring term. Pupils are drawn from the surrounding estates
comprising mainly local authority and housing association properties.
Some of the area is beset by difficult social backgrounds where
unemployment is relatively high. Over 50 per cent of pupils are
entitled to free school meals. All pupils are of white UK heritage and
no pupil speaks English as an additional language. There is relatively
little movement in and out of the school except at the beginning of the
school year. A significant number of children enter both the nursery
and reception classes with below average standards. The school has 54
pupils with special educational needs (an above average number) none of
whom has a statement of special educational need. Many have moderate
learning problems involving language and communication difficulties or
difficulties within their own personal and social development. The
school’s aim is to ensure that all its pupils reach their full
potential, academically, socially and emotionally. The school has
received three successive national achievement awards for its improving
standards over time and recently gained Investors in People status.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM
|
Members of the inspection team |
Subject responsibilities |
| 21060 |
Mr G Brown |
Lead inspector |
Music Physical education Religious education The Foundation Stage |
| 11437 |
Mr A Anderson |
Lay inspector |
|
| 32283 |
Mr D Goodchild |
Team inspector |
Science Information and communication technology Art and design |
| 22274 |
Mrs V Rogers |
Team inspector |
English Geography Special educational needs |
| 2759 |
Mr D Sleightholme |
Team Inspector |
Mathematics Design and technology History |
The inspection contractor was:
Cambridge Education Associates
Demeter House
Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2RS
Any
concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be
made initially to the inspection contractor. The procedures are set out
in the leaflet ‘Complaining about Ofsted Inspections’, which is available from Ofsted Publications Centre (telephone 07002 637833) or Ofsted’s website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
| REPORT CONTENTS |
| Page |
| PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT |
6 |
| PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE MAIN INSPECTION FINDINGS |
|
| STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS |
8 |
| Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses |
|
| Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities |
|
| QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL |
11 |
| Teaching and learning |
|
| The curriculum |
|
| Care, guidance and support |
|
| Partnership with parents, other schools and the community |
|
| LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT |
16 |
| THE INFANT ASSESSMENT UNIT |
17 |
| PART C: THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN AREAS OF LEARNING, |
|
| SUBJECTS AND COURSES |
19 |
| PART D: SUMMARY OF THE MAIN INSPECTION JUDGEMENTS |
35 |
PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT
OVERALL EVALUATION
This
is an effective school. Teaching and learning are good in all years so
that pupils learn thoroughly, reach satisfactory standards and achieve
well. Most work is challenging and imaginative. Leadership and
management are both very good, ensuring that the school is forward
looking, well resourced and aims to improve year on year. The school
gives good value for money.
The school’s main strengths and weaknesses are:
- Pupils
attain good standards in science, information and communication
technology (ICT) and in art and design. Standards in mathematics are
slightly below average overall by the end of Year 2. Pupils’ work is
not always presented neatly enough but most achieve well over time.
- Teaching is good and staff have high expectations as to what pupils should do and how they should behave.
- Pupils enjoy their lessons, work hard and behave well. Their personal development is well planned for.
- Attendance is below the national average and unsatisfactory overall.
- The
curriculum is strengthened by visits and visitors together with a wide
range of enrichment activities outside normal school hours. Some of the
pupils’ skills in non-core subjects need greater attention.
- The
headteacher and other key staff provide very clear educational focus
and direction. Governors, however, need to be more involved in helping
to shape school improvement.
Since the last inspection in April 1999, the
school has tackled successfully all the key areas of weakness
identified then and has made very good progress since that time.
Standards have continued to rise and the school has received several
national awards for achievement. The methods used to assess pupils’
work in core subjects like English have improved and pupils’ individual
progress is carefully monitored. The Foundation Stage (nursery and
reception) is now planned more effectively.
STANDARDS ACHIEVED
| Results in National Curriculum tests at the end of Year 6, compared with: |
|
all schools |
|
similar schools |
| 2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2002 |
| English |
C |
C |
D |
A |
| Mathematics |
E |
B |
E |
C |
| Science |
B |
A* |
B |
A |
Key:
A*- very high; A - well above average; B – above average; C – average;
D – below average; E – well below average Similar schools are those
whose pupils attained similarly at the end of Year 2.
Pupils achieve well in all years. The
goals children are expected to reach by the end of reception are
largely achieved except in language and literacy and mathematical
development. Attainment in these areas is relatively low when children
enter nursery. By the end of Year 2, pupils attain broadly average
standards in reading and writing and above average standards in
science, ICT and art. Their standards in mathematics continue to
improve but remain just below average overall. By the end of Year 6,
pupils’ standards are high in science, above average in ICT and art and
design and broadly at the level expected for their age in all other
subjects. Where standards in some subjects vary considerably from year
to year, it is often because of the nature of that particular year
group including the number of pupils present with special educational
needs. Most children achieve well because they learn at an appropriate
level and rate and the good teaching encourages them to do their best.
Note: The non-core subjects are those other than English, mathematics and science
Pupils’ personal qualities, including their spiritual, moral, social and
cultural development, are good overall and well nurtured by the school.
Pupils show enthusiasm for learning and behave and work well. Most also
play harmoniously and are supportive and sensitive to the needs of
others. Relationships in the school are very good and the oldest pupils
help younger children in all sorts of ways. Attendance is
unsatisfactory because it is below average and some pupils arrive late
to school.
QUALITY OF EDUCATION
The quality of education provided by the school is good. This is because teaching is
largely effective, the pupils’ individual needs are clearly planned for
and they learn well. Teaching and learning are particularly good in
English, mathematics and science and also in ICT and art, where
planning is effective and where teachers recognise that pupils learn in
different ways. Most work set is challenging to each individual
although this is less successfully done in relation to pupils’ skills
in the non-core subjects. Class numbers are relatively small and
teachers are ably supported by a team of committed classroom
assistants. Teachers assess the pupils’ work well, although some of the
marking is less helpful than it should be. Pupils with special
educational needs are well supported and also achieve well.
The
school curriculum is good and provides pupils with a wide range of
opportunities to learn, including clubs and activities outside of
normal hours. This is a caring, supportive school where staff know the
pupils well and have their best interests at heart. The links with
parents are strong and helpful and pupils’ learning is enriched by the
school’s contacts within the wider community, including its links with
secondary schools.
LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
The leadership and management of the school are very good. The
work of the headteacher and key staff brings purpose and direction to
the school, particularly through the emphasis on standards and the
development of the whole child. The governing body are helpful and
committed but are not sufficiently involved in matters relating to
school development and improvement.
PARENTS’ AND PUPILS’ VIEWS OF THE SCHOOL
Parents
are very satisfied with how the school functions and with the standards
reached by their children. They feel well informed as to how their
children are doing and recognise the care, skills and commitment of
staff. Pupils enjoy coming to school and clearly know what is expected
of them. They like the way they are rewarded for doing their work well
and for behaving properly.
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED
The most important things the school should do to improve are to:
- ensure
that non-core subjects are carefully planned to bring out the skills
that individual pupils need and that these are systematically taught,
learned and assessed;
- maintain and if possible extend those procedures likely to improve pupils’ attendance and punctuality;
- extend the contribution of governors to the school’s improvement programme;
- lay more emphasis on the presentation of pupils’ work and ensure they complete this tidily.
PART B: COMMENTARY ON THE INSPECTION FINDINGS
STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS
Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses
Achievement across all age-groups is good and there is no significant difference between that of girls and boys. Standards are now close to and sometimes above the national average in core subjects.
Main strengths and weaknesses
- By
the end of reception, children are likely to attain the various goals
expected for their age except in language, literacy and communication
and mathematical development.
- Standards in Years 1 to 6 vary from year to year but continue to rise overall in the core subjects.
- Pupils
throughout the school achieve particularly well in science, ICT and art
and design and standards in these subjects are on course to be above
average by the end of Years 2 and 6.
- By the end of Year 2 standards are slightly below average in mathematics.
- By the end of Year 6 standards are broadly average in English and mathematics.
Commentary
Standards at Level 4 and above (percentages) in national tests at the end of Year 6 in 2002
| Standards in: |
School results |
National results |
| English |
67 (79) |
75 (75) |
| Mathematics |
53 (91) |
73 (71) |
| Science |
83 (97) |
86 (87) |
There were 30 pupils in the year group. Figures in brackets are for the previous year
Standards at Level 2 and above (percentages) in national tests at the end of Year 2 in 2002
| Standards in: |
School results |
National results |
| reading |
89 (81) |
84 (84) |
| writing |
96 (92) |
86 (86) |
| mathematics |
93 (84) |
90 (91) |
There were 46 pupils in the year group. Figures in brackets are for the previous year
- The
above tables reflect the percentage scores of Year 2 and Year 6 pupils
in tests in the core areas in 2002. This is a school that shows quite
significant variations in pupils’ overall performance from year to
year, depending on the size and nature of the year group. This can be
seen, for example, by the Year 6 results achieved in 2002 compared with
those of 2001, the latter cohort containing an unusually high
proportion of pupils with above average attainment. The indicative
results from 2003 suggest that standards in Year 6 continue to rise
overall, including the proportion of pupils in English and mathematics
who achieve the higher levels for their age. This trend was also
confirmed by the results of inspection. Standards in science fell
slightly in 2002 but remain well above average. Test results in Year 2
are often affected by the percentage of pupils with special educational
needs, including those in the Infant Assessment Unit. In 2002, a
relatively small number of Year 2 pupils reached the higher levels for
their age in mathematics, although, over time, many more pupils are
reaching at least the basic standard expected for their age. The
inspection also confirms
- that
standards in English and mathematics are rising across the school over
time and that it continues to set challenging targets for the future.
- Despite
achieving well in both nursery and reception, a significant number of
children are unlikely to attain all the relevant goals for their age in
language, literacy, communication and mathematical development.
Difficulties persist for many in speech, early reading and writing
skills and in understanding number. However, many children are on
course to achieve the goals expected for their age in personal,
creative and physical development and in their knowledge and
understanding of the world. This represents good achievement over time
set against their standards on entry to the nursery and is a commentary
on the good planning, teaching and learning that occur.
- Most
pupils continue to make good progress and to achieve well in the core
subjects in Years 1 and 2. By the end of Year 2, standards in
mathematics vary considerably and are currently marginally below the
national average within the year group as a whole. Many pupils also
find difficulties in speaking out with clarity and confidence about
their learning, although listening skills are generally good. The good
work done in the Literacy Strategy has helped raise reading and writing
to their present average levels. Improvements in science have occurred
over time and standards are now above the expected level for Year 2
pupils. There is no significant variation between the achievements and
standards of girls and boys in core subjects by the end of Year 2. The
recent school emphasis on ICT has meant growing confidence among staff
and pupils and standards are now above those expected for the age of
the pupils. Standards in art and design have remained above average
since the previous inspection. Pupils perform at broadly the expected
level for their age in all other National Curriculum subjects and in
religious education.
- The good foundations for pupils’
learning laid lower down the school work to good effect as pupils move
through the junior years. Achievement remains good in core subjects.
Currently, Year 6 pupils are likely to achieve broadly average
standards in English and mathematics, above average in ICT and art and
design and well above average in science. In these subjects teachers
are careful to build on the pupils’ previous learning and the work set
is usually challenging and appropriate to the ability of the
individual. Standards in other subjects, including religious education,
are broadly in line with that expected for their age, although in
subjects such as geography and design and technology, pupils do not
always acquire and practise the skills they require in a systematic
way. As in Years 1 and 2, there is no significant difference between
the achievement and standards of girls and boys.
- All
pupils benefit from the very good leadership and management of the
school, particularly the emphasis on driving up standards over time.
Parents are generally happy with the standards the school achieves and
many pupils feel they are doing well. The improvements over time have
been recognised by several achievement awards given by the Department
for Education and Skills. The school’s tracking system has also enabled
challenging targets to be set in important areas. Pupils with special
educational needs generally attain lower than average standards but
achieve as well as their peers in relation to their previous learning.
Their needs are clearly identified, learning targets are set and they
are well supported by teachers and classroom assistants. Higher
attaining pupils also achieve well, although there is scope for even
more challenging provision in non-core subjects.
Pupils’ attitudes, values and other personal qualities
Pupils'
attitudes, values, behaviour and personal development are all good.
Pupils' attendance and punctuality are unsatisfactory.
Main strengths and weaknesses are
- Most pupils exhibit good attitudes and behaviour in the classroom.
- Pupils are well behaved around the school and in the playground. No recent exclusions.
- The provision for the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good overall.
- Attendance and punctuality are unsatisfactory.
- Children
in the Foundation Stage are on course to achieve the goals expected for
their age in personal and social education. Most pupils in all classes
behave well in lessons and around the school. For example, in two
observed assemblies, pupils walked quietly into the hall and responded
very appropriately to the teacher’s questions and stories. In the
playground, pupils played well together and had harmonious
relationships with all supervisory staff. The recently introduced
playground 'Buddy' system works very well in practice (every child in
the school is a potential buddy) and this makes a very positive
contribution to pupils' personal development. The school’s ‘golden
time’ system, whereby pupils have to maintain points earned and which
lead to a free choice of activities, has caught the imagination of the
pupils and their parents and works well as a motivation to behaving
well and working hard. Pupils have a very positive view of their school
and enjoy almost everything that goes on. They appreciate the variety
within their learning and the many ‘extras’ in which they can
participate. Parents also believe that pupils behave well and note that
there have been no recent exclusions.
- Teachers have
high expectations of pupils' behaviour and this can clearly be seen in
the classroom where most lessons were well paced and pupils’ concentration levels were high. In one observed physical education (PE)
lesson, for example, pupils worked very well together in pairs as they
practised and developed their bat and ball skills. Pupils of different
abilities and backgrounds play and learn well together as do girls and
boys.
- The school council has been in operation for a
few years and provides a very good forum for pupils to debate the
issues of the day as seen through their own eyes. Most pupils have made
some contribution to the school council system and to this extent it is
a very inclusive provision which adds significantly to pupils personal
development. Many other opportunities are provided for pupils to take
responsibility for their own standards of work and in carrying out
various tasks around the school. One child who was unable to take part
in a PE lesson was well utilised by the teacher to give out and collect
various resources relevant to the lesson’s aims.
- The
spiritual development of pupils is satisfactory but the planned
provision is not strong enough. During worship and in a minority of
lessons, pupils have time to reflect on what they and others are doing
and to think about their own values, beliefs and relationships.
Provision for moral and social development is very good and often
hinges around ‘circle time’ and other occasions where qualities such as
honesty, rules, truthfulness and being special are debated. The
cultural development of pupils is satisfactory and pupils have a firm
grasp of their local heritage and the traditions of their own area.
Given its lack of pupils from different ethnic groups, the school could
provide more opportunities to make pupils aware of the diverse nature
of society. However, comparative faiths are taught satisfactorily in
religious education.
- The overall attendance at the
school is unsatisfactory. It is regularly below the annual national
average although there is no unauthorised absence. There is significant
evidence of pupil lateness although this involves a relatively small
number of pupils. It is vital that all parents support the school’s
clear policy on attendance and ensure their children attend with
absolute regularity. The school is very proactive in following up all
unexplained absences and in promoting good attendance but their efforts
have not always met with great success.
Attendance in the latest complete reporting year (%)
| Authorised absence |
|
| School data |
|
6.8 |
| National data |
|
5.4 |
| Unauthorised absence |
|
| School data |
|
0 |
| National data |
|
0.5 |
The table gives the percentage of half days (sessions) missed through absence for the latest complete reporting year.
Exclusions
Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year
The table gives the number of exclusions, which may be different from the number of pupils excluded.
QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL
The quality of education provided by the school, including teaching and the curriculum, is good and provides well for the needs of all the pupils.
Teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning is good across all phases of the school and leads to most pupils achieving well and making good progress.
Main strengths and weaknesses
In the nursery and reception classes:
- Very good relationships help children settle quickly into school life.
- Adults form a strong team and support children well in their learning.
- A spacious, well-resourced area and a good range of opportunities stimulate learning.
- Activities are well managed and assessments made of children’s attainment have improved.
- In Years 1 to 6:
- Challenging teaching gets the best out of most pupils.
- Very good use of information and communication technology (ICT) across other subjects.
- Strong emphasis on literacy and numeracy and on the development of scientific skills.
- Good assessment in the core subjects contributes to rising standards.
- Work well matched to pupils of all abilities, enabling learning to be relatively rapid.
- Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ presentation of their work not always high enough.
- Basic assessment in the non-core subjects limits the achievement of some pupils.
Commentary
Summary of teaching observed during the inspection in 55 lessons
| Excellent |
Very good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory |
Poor |
Very Poor |
| 0 |
8 (14.5%) |
28 (51%) |
19 (34.5%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The
table gives the number of lessons observed in each of the seven
categories used to make judgements about lessons; figures in brackets
show percentages where 30 or more lessons are seen.
- The
quality of teaching and learning is good, with several examples of very
good practice in each phase. This represents an overall improvement
since the previous inspection. Teachers have benefited from appropriate
training and regular evaluation of their work. They have also been
supported by guidance on how they can best improve their practice,
particularly through gaining a working knowledge of how pupils learn in
different ways. The teaching of pupils with special educational needs
is generally good, particularly in English and mathematics, where the
focus is on learning in small, meaningful stages. However, in some
non-core subjects, the work planned for such pupils does not always
match their needs as too often all
- pupils
in the class are given the same task to complete. In most lessons, the
higher attaining pupils are targeted appropriately and work is relevant
to their needs. Again, this is less consistently the case in the
non-core subjects.
- Parents
agree that teaching is an important strength of the schools’ provision.
Returns from a recent questionnaire showed that almost all parents
believe teaching to be good or very good. In response to their
questionnaires, pupils feel that teachers listen to them, treat them
fairly and encourage learning.
- The good quality
of teaching in the Foundation Stage ensures that children make good
progress in their learning. This is because the wide range of
activities both supports and challenges children. Activities are
carefully structured and teach children important skills which are
carefully assessed and then built on. However, there is also
opportunity for children to make choices and develop independence- for
example, during self-registration. Lessons and activities are managed
well by the teachers with very good support from the assistants.
- Elsewhere,
teachers also are knowledgeable, well prepared and plan interesting and
challenging lessons. This, together with high expectations of
behaviour, ensures that classes are orderly and all pupils make the
most of time in lessons. Learning in this setting is relatively rapid.
Many teachers also make good and sometimes very good provision for
pupils to take responsibility for their own learning. This is
particularly the case in ICT and science. Very good teaching in ICT
ensures that pupils develop many computer skills. This enables them to
record and research and supports learning in other subjects. A Year 6
class used a search engine to research fox hunting. This activity was
effective in developing their reading and study skills.
- The
teaching of literacy and numeracy has been given high priority in
recent times and most lessons are well structured towards the Literacy
and Numeracy Strategies. Reading, spelling and writing skills form a
major part of the curriculum and the intensity of such work has
undoubtedly helped to drive up standards. Number is also well taught,
although some lessons need greater emphasis on pupils applying known
knowledge and methods to problem solving.
- Independent
learning is encouraged, for example, through investigation-based
lessons in science. Pupils develop very good scientific skills because
teachers ask questions that set challenges such as ‘What do snails
eat?’ or ‘How do we find out which is the best spinner?’. Teachers are
adept at using probing questions that encourage pupils to draw and
build on their previous learning. In their work on circuits Year 4
pupils remembered that plastic was not a conductor of electricity. Year
2 pupils said that the snail had to be placed the same distance from
the food otherwise it wouldn’t be a ‘fair test’.
- Assessment
in the non-core subjects is not rigorous or consistent enough. It is
sometimes limited to teachers writing comments at the end of a unit of
work or at the end of the year. Whilst this provides a picture of how
well a pupil has worked on a topic it does not always measure standards
against national expectations. Nor does it identify what a pupil needs
to do to improve. Expectations of pupils’ presentation is not always
high enough and sometimes pupils produce quite inferior looking work
which goes unchecked.
- Procedures for assessing
pupils’ attainment and progress are very good in English, mathematics
and science. This supports teachers’ planning and ensures that the
needs of all pupils are met. Tracking of pupils’ progress through the
school enables the teachers to set targets for improvement. These
appear in the front of pupils’ exercise books and, in some classes,
individual targets appear on pupils’ desks. In the Foundation Stage,
assessments made on a daily basis enable adults to see how well
children are progressing and thus how best to give appropriate support.
The curriculum
The overall opportunities for learning are good.
The curriculum meets statutory requirements and represents a broad
range of opportunities that provide well for the diverse needs,
interests and aptitudes of all the pupils.
Main strengths and weaknesses
- The curriculum for science and ICT is particularly good.
- There is effective provision for building up many basic skills in English and mathematics.
- Good curriculum enrichment is provided through an interesting range of extra-curricular activities.
- Pupils’ skills in some of the non-core subjects are not developed well enough.
- Learning resources are good and the very good accommodation is used well to extend pupils’ learning.
Commentary
- The
curriculum has continued to improve and develop since the previous
inspection. The work done in the planning and delivery of literacy,
mathematics, science and ICT has been particularly impressive and has
contributed much to pupils’ achievements and the rising standards in
these areas. It is also a good, inclusive curriculum which allows
access by all pupils and provides well for their individual strengths
and weaknesses. Strong emphasis is placed on literacy and numeracy and
this is reflected in the school’s daily timetable. There is some danger
that parts of the non-core curriculum, such as geography and design
technology, may be a little fragmented in terms of the way pupils learn
and practise their newly acquired skills. The school is rightly looking
at the balance of its working week to ensure that time is allocated in
the most effective way. The curriculum prepares pupils effectively for
movement between year groups and also for subsequent stages of
education, including transfer to the secondary school.
- The
curriculum provision in the Foundation Stage (nursery and reception) is
good and much has been achieved by the staff in this respect. Planning
and liaison between the nursery and reception are effective and
children are introduced to knowledge and skills in a very structured
way. Increased partnership with parents is helping to ensure children
recognise and benefit from the links between home and school.
- As
well as making good provision overall for the subjects in the National
Curriculum, the school meets its requirements to teach religious
education and this is a subject that helps pupils to become more aware
of the diverse nature of society and the presence and beliefs of other
ethnic groups. The programme followed has strong links with daily acts
of collective worship which also meet statutory requirements. Over the
past year, the school has developed very well its provision for
personal and social education including good health, sex education,
drug and alcohol awareness programmes and the beginnings of
citizenship. Regular lessons have taught pupils to be conscious of
their own emerging roles in society and helped them to develop the very
good relationships that now exist in school.
- The
school has overall good curricular provision for higher attaining
pupils although it needs to think more precisely how it will help
identify and support any pupils who are particularly gifted and
talented. Pupils with special educational needs are well supported
through their school lives and, as a result, achieve well. Classes are
small and the very good adult/pupil ratio allows children with learning
difficulties to work through their problems. The individual educational
plans prepared for such pupils are well focused and help their
knowledge in small meaningful steps. Classroom assistants are used well
to support pupils with degrees of problems in English and mathematics
in particular. All pupils, irrespective of their ability, benefit from
the different teaching strategies and methods used by staff.
- The
previous inspection report expressed some concerns about the lack of
extra-curricular activities to support pupils’ learning. The school has
now developed a wide range of visits, visitors and out-of-hours clubs
to enrich pupils’ everyday experiences. Pupils are taught off site in
as diverse places as local churches, Hemlington Lake, museums, theatres
and the public library. A wealth of visitors contribute much to
learning, including the police, visiting PE specialists and musicians
performing arts groups. Many pupils attend and enjoy after-school clubs
such as French, animation, computers, netball and dance. Pupils’ questionnaires and parents demonstrate how much these activities are
appreciated and the benefits they bring.
- Learning
is very well supported by a knowledgeable teaching staff and an above
average number of classroom assistants. Staff are deployed well and in
some cases, such as science, specialist teaching occurs. Most pupils
are ‘set’ for literacy and mathematics according to their potential and
this helps staff to provide appropriate challenge to different groups.
Classroom assistants play a vital part in pupils’ learning and plan and
work well with individuals and small groups.
- The
main accommodation is well maintained, spacious and very good overall.
Specialist rooms are set aside for subjects such as music and this
works well. The facilities for ICT are very good and provide state of
the art accommodation and resources, factors that are clearly impacting
on pupils’ achievements and standards. Learning resources are good in
most subjects and are well used by staff and pupils to ensure that the
curricular needs of the pupils are well met.
Care, guidance and support
The
level of child protection, welfare and support given to pupils combined
with the very good procedures for promoting the development and well
being of individual pupils, have a positive impact on learning and are
a significant strength of the school.
Main strengths and weaknesses
- Effective child protection procedures are in place.
- Teaching
and support staff know their pupils very well and provide very good
support and guidance as they progress through the school.
- Good assessments are made of pupils’ academic and personal development.
- Very good risk assessments take place in advance of school trips and around the building as a whole.
- Very good systems are in place to seek, listen and act on pupils' views of the school.
- Child
protection procedures are in place and the reporting person is known to
all staff in the school. Teaching and support staff, themselves
supported by a range of external agencies, provide a high degree of
welfare support to individual pupils as exampled by the good provision
for pupils with special educational needs. Pupils’ academic performance
and personal development are monitored both formally and informally and
steps are taken to identify any individual problems through a range of
effective strategies.
- Teachers and support
staff know the pupils very well and are quick to observe any personal
difficulties exhibited by them and to take rapid and remedial action.
The assessment and monitoring of pupils’ academic and personal
development are good and lead to clear targets being set and the
raising of standards as a whole. The school operates a very good first
aid system for minor accidents and appropriate records are maintained.
Regular fire drills are carried out and the school also maintains
medical logs. Health and safety audits of the site are carried out and
the school is very proactive when considering possible risks on trips
out of school.
- Lessons in personal and social
education are used well to provide pupils with the opportunity to talk
about themselves and to express ideas and suggestions as to how they
perceive a range of issues. The school council enhances this provision
by providing every pupil with a voice in relation to how the school
should evolve. Pupils' personal development is further enhanced through
the provision of both class and individual targets to which pupils are
expected to work. Most children are clear what these are and have a
positive view about their purpose and value.
- The
school acknowledges pupils' achievement through the praise given to
them in the classroom and, more formally, in regular sharing and
presentation assemblies to which parents are usually invited. This
practice is clearly a much valued and effective area of the school's
promotion of pupils' personal development and self-esteem.
Partnership with parents, other schools and the community
Parents' views of the school are very positive and the school’s links with parents are very good. The school’s links with the local community, including other schools, are also good.
Main strengths and weaknesses
- The majority of parents like the school and feel that their child is happy here.
- Parents feel that the school is well led and managed.
- The teaching is thought to be good and teachers are approachable.
- The school reaches out very well to all parents and gives them the right sort of information.
- The school uses the wider community and other schools well to support the curriculum.
- A few parents are not supportive of the school, for example in relation to the need for good attendance.
Commentary
- The
parents' meeting with the inspectors was reasonably well attended but
the parental questionnaire was returned by only a moderate number of
parents. Overall, a significant majority of parents are very supportive
of the school including its aims and objectives. Parents feel that
their children like school and that they are making good progress.
Parents also feel that the teaching is good and that the school is well
managed. The pupils' questionnaire was completed by the majority of
children and their overall response was overwhelmingly positive. They
appreciate most the various clubs and ‘golden time’ (which allows them
to be rewarded with free time if they have worked and behaved well).
Almost all pupils realise they have to work hard but feel that teachers
are fair and that learning is fun.
- The
information provided by the school through the prospectus and annual
governor’s report and via regular and well designed newsletters is of a
very good standard. Annual academic reports to parents are well
conceived. There are also two parents' evenings each year during which
parents have the opportunity to discuss their children’s progress and
these evenings are generally well attended and help cement the bond
between home and school. In addition the school holds a target setting
evening near the start of each academic year to ensure that parents are
made aware of what their children need to concentrate on during the
next 12 months. The school notes carefully which parents attend these
open evenings and any who are unable to attend are sent relevant
details through the post to ensure that they are kept fully informed
about their children’s development.
- A
few parents are frequent visitors to the school both to provide very
welcome classroom support or to assist with external visits and
occasional residential trips. All parents have been invited to enter
into a home/school agreement, which is designed to promote improved
communication between the school, parents and children. Parental
attendance at school
- concerts, celebrations and
sports days is very good. The relatively few parents who do not
cooperate with the school’s policy on pupil attendance are rightly
being targeted, as nonattendance at school can lead to gaps in learning
and progress.
- Good
use is made of the local environment to enhance pupils’ learning. The
school has good links with the local church and library and regular
field trips are made to study the local environment. The school nurse
is a regular school visitor and the education social worker is very
well utilised by the school to assist in the promotion of good
attendance and punctuality. The school has good links with the local
Cellnet Stadium at which some pupils undertake occasional project work
inside and outside the school day.
- Very close
links are also maintained with several local schools- for example,
sports development activities which take place in conjunction with the
local secondary school and inter-school competitive sport. Contacts
with other schools are also good in relation to the transfer of pupils
in and out of Hemlington Hall. The school also encourages a range of
incoming visitors to the school to enhance the curriculum for its
pupils. Recent visitors have included a woman who talked about the
manufacture of felt and an ex-member of the pop group Status Quo who
brought in a very wide variety of musical instruments.
LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
The quality of leadership and management is very good and central to pupils’ learning and achievements
- The governance of the school is satisfactory.
- The leadership of the headteacher is very good.
- The leadership of other key staff is very good.
- Management is very effective.
Main strengths and weaknesses
- The
headteacher and staff have a very clear vision of school improvement.
They work effectively as a team particularly in raising standards in
core subjects and ICT.
- There is a very positive ethos and the aim to meet the needs of all pupils is promoted very well.
- Strategic planning is comprehensive and detailed and covers financial and training implications well.
- The
governors are very committed and meet their statutory requirements but
are not sufficiently involved in school development matters.
- The headteacher and staff monitor standards and track pupils’ progress rigorously.
- Staff development has been given high priority and the school has achieved Investors in People status.
- Financial management is very good and specific funding is spent appropriately.
Commentary
- The
headteacher provides inspirational leadership. Working very effectively
with all staff, she leads a team that has a clear vision that reflects
the aims of the school very well. Very good progress has been made
since the previous inspection. Leadership and management techniques
have been strengthened at all levels and the result is considerable
success in raising standards in core subjects and ICT. The very
positive ethos, high expectations and strong commitment to inclusion
are significant factors in helping pupils achieve well and to make good
progress across the school.
- Governors
support the school well and back the strong commitment to improving
pupils’ confidence in literacy and numeracy and ICT skills. They
regularly approve new policies and make sound use of their committee
structure when taking decisions on financial, curriculum
- and
staffing matters. They are less pro-active in matters relating to
initiating change and school development. Strategic planning is
comprehensive, detailed and covers financial and training implications
well. At present, however, the governors’ role in improvement planning
is mainly focussed on ratification of plans that the headteacher and
staff have drawn up rather than on questioning or challenging the
senior managers sufficiently on the range of options open to them.
- The
headteacher and staff monitor standards and track pupils’ progress
rigorously and they assess their own performance and other aspects of
the school very well. Performance management arrangements, introduced
since the previous inspection, are well embedded and several members of
the teaching staff function as team leaders for other teachers. All
teaching staff agree personal targets with their respective leader and
all are supported well in their roles and with personal career
development. There are good arrangements for the induction of new
staff. The strong focus on staff support and development resulted in
the school meeting the criteria in March 2003 for the Investors in
People standard.
- Financial management is very
good with specific funding, such as that available for pupils with
special educational needs, spent appropriately. Considerable progress
has been made in improving provision in classrooms, shared teaching
areas and in support for administration. The school has injected
additional funding to that provided externally to enhance several
initiatives including the high level of ICT provision. There has been
good consultation with parents on their views and aspirations for the
school, a detailed analysis of pupil performance data and careful
scrutiny of the options available when services are being engaged. The
school is developing best value principles well, particularly in its
competitiveness and the way it contrasts its performance with that of
other schools and against its own annual targets. The school provides
good value for money.
- This very well managed school operates efficiently and smoothly on a day-to-day basis. The
management has a positive effect on the ethos of the school and on the achievements of the
children, factors that are also recognised by both parents and pupils.
Financial information for the year March 2002 to April 2003
| Income and expenditure (£) |
|
| Total income |
|
975,221 |
| Total expenditure |
|
888,0 | |